What Is The Koleston Colour Chart For Hair?

WHAT IS TALK CORRECTLY? Instructions and dates

from an article by Ambrose Rabanales:

The article is an answer that came to light under the authorship of Professor Mario Banderas whose title was you do not say! In all cases, the author says based on the authority of the Royal English Academy in SAR below. So is "right", according to Professor flags all agree that the SAR in these works and "wrong" all that censorship or simply not in the book said. Or even if they are there is because "not exist" and therefore should not be used, although many of them are commonly used by the speakers, even by eminent professionals in even more of a chance we've seen articles written in newspapers, books or magazines.

Among the forms that exist are for example: toperoles, beat it, Pachot, etc., For the spelling: license; by their morphology, like, hurt, put / your, etc.)., This approach does not limit ourselves only to the lexicon exist: technocracy, role, instrumentalization, hyperkinetic, Freudian.

And even more in university settings are used shamelessly language, undergraduate, postgraduate, master, kindergarten and nursery, although "no."

And soar without both, can also include everyday terms fully entrenched in Chile, which are in the same situation: cruet, chub, sink, light bulb instead of academics: litter, tumbler, toilet and light bulb. Errors

correctness standard

Obviously, there are errors. How can it not be something used openly? How can it be wrong in a way that does not exist? If so we have to say that none of the speaking is expressed correctly. The truth is that absolutely impossible to speak or write in Chile (and elsewhere in the Hispanic world) without the use of trademarked terms en su totalidad o en su significado en el diccionario académico español. Entonces, existen dos errores fundamentales en dicho criterio 1) identificar la lengua española de hoy con el diccionario mayor de esta corporación y 2) creer y hacer creer que las obras de la RAE son guías absolutamente infalibles del buen decir.

Las obras académicas no agotan la lengua española, por a lo menos dos razones, porque incluye términos obsoletos o de muy poco uso y no incluye términos de uso habitual, es decir, “su ausencia en el diccionario no significa por si sola que (tales acepciones) no existan en el uso o sean incorrectas”.

Recordemos a Bello “no se crea que recomendando la conservación del castellano sea de mi ánimo tachar de vicioso y espúreo todo lo que es peculiar de los americanos”. Así pues como Bello con su sabiduría estimula la creación lingüística conforme al “genio del lengua”, mediante la cual ésta se enriquece. Por lo tanto, los puristas del lenguaje sólo hacen anquilosar la lengua y no permitir su carácter dinámico y evolutivo.

Es un hecho indiscutible que la lengua está cambiando permanentemente por la inmensa cantidad y heterogeneidad (geográfica, histórica, social y cultural) de sus hablantes, no puede encerrársela enteramente en un diccionario o una gramática. Se ha afirmado con razón que desde que ven luz estas obras and are stiff. Hence the numerous amendments and corrections to the SAR itself. The making of one edition to another. The

feasible here is to use the language according to the environment in which we live or we have to read printed. This works by more than the works mentioned language (which very few people know) serve as a model language oral or written texts that bombard us every day and at night the media for the masses: the newspaper, magazines, radio and especially television. Hence the enormous responsibility for the destiny of our language, shared responsibility with the educational establishments that train talking and written to the media. Also literary and scientific texts and philosophical model remain particularly for those who have the privilege of entering higher education.

SAR because, as Bennett points out in his statements is based on the use of language that makes it especially the educated. As seen in this corporation that supports its use and is not about that. Hence the forms recommended by the schools associated with inclusion in the dictionary or grammar are because they are used to place on record it and to the individual that understands not know when you hear or read and not necessarily to use them. Then works academics are not infallible guides say good, because usually they point to how the speaker usually proceeds and not to proceed, describes what is done to guide the ignorant.

English is fluent in many different ways, as many as required every situation, every language is like plurinormativo. An exaggerated concern with linguistic purity can be at odds with the progress and unity of the English language.